We Asked AI for 220 Startup Names. Only 1 Had an Available .com.
Updated 2026-06-26
The short version
- We generated 220 startup name ideas the way AI assistants do (real-word brandables, compounds, and coinages) and checked each .com against the live registry.
- Only 1 of the 220 had an available .com. That is 0.5%. The other 219 were already registered, every one confirmed via RDAP.
- AI naming tools optimize for names that sound good, not names you can register, and good-sounding short names were claimed years ago.
- The fix is not more AI name lists; it is generating in the styles where availability survives (coinages, compounds, near-words) and checking the registry on every name.
- The lone survivor was pravelo.com. Everything else, including plausible coinages, was gone.
Ask ChatGPT or any AI assistant for startup name ideas and you get a tidy list of polished, brandable-sounding names. There is one thing the list never tells you: whether you can actually register any of them. So we checked. We generated 220 startup names in the styles AI tools produce and ran every one against the live .com registry. The result was worse than we expected.
What we did
We asked an AI assistant for startup name ideas the way anyone would, then expanded the list to 220 names spanning the three styles these tools lean on: real-word brandables (Sage, Orbit, Helix), two-word compounds (CloudNest, DataForge, NetPulse), and invented coinages (Nexora, Vantix, Optura). We deliberately skewed roughly half the list toward coinages and compounds, because that is exactly where available .com domains are supposed to survive, so the test would be fair rather than stacked with obviously-taken dictionary words. Then we checked every name against the live .com registry using RDAP, the ICANN-mandated registration protocol, with a DNS lookup as a fallback, the same verification path our generator uses on every name. The full list and result are reproducible from a script we kept.
The result: 1 of 220
Of the 220 names, exactly 1 had an available .com. That is 0.5%. The other 219 were already registered, and 100% of the verdicts came straight from the registry via RDAP, not from softer DNS guesses. The single survivor was pravelo.com. The part that should stop you: even the half of the list we skewed toward invented coinages, the names with the best odds, came back almost entirely taken. The polished, brandable-sounding names an AI hands you are, in practice, names other people already own.
Why AI name lists are almost all taken
This is not bad luck, it is how AI naming works. An assistant generating names optimizes for one thing: names that sound good, short, smooth, pronounceable, vaguely meaningful. But those are the exact qualities that made a name desirable years ago, when there were still .coms to claim, so the best-sounding names were registered long ago, often by domain investors holding them for resale. On top of that, an AI in a normal chat cannot check live availability: it is producing text, not querying a registry, so it has no idea whether anything it suggests is free. And because every AI gravitates to the same handful of nice patterns, its suggestions collide with the more than 160 million .com domains already registered. The better a name sounds, the more likely it is already gone.
The names that do survive
Availability has not vanished, it has just moved. It lives in unique strings that no one else generated: invented coinages, fused compounds, and near-words (a real word with one brandable mutation, like Flickr or Olipop). Across the brand names our own generator produces, which leans deliberately into those styles and then filters, roughly 7.4% have an available .com. That is about fifteen times the hit rate of a naive AI list, and it is still low, which is why volume and verification matter so much. The one thing that never changes is the need to check: the only way to know a .com is free is to ask the registry, name by name.
What to do instead of an AI name list
If you are naming a startup, do not treat an AI name list as a shortlist of domains, treat it as raw inspiration that is almost certainly unavailable as-is. Then do four things. Brainstorm in the styles where availability survives: coinages, compounds, and near-words, not single dictionary words. Generate many candidates, because the hit rate is low and you need volume to find the survivors. Check the .com on every candidate against the live registry before you get attached to one. And do not settle for a hyphen or a worse extension just because the first nice name is taken, re-roll instead. That loop, generate in available-friendly styles, check the registry on every name, and surface only the ones you can actually own, is exactly what DomainGenius automates.
Frequently asked questions
Why are almost all AI-suggested startup names taken?
Because AI optimizes for names that sound good, and good-sounding short names were registered years ago. AI also cannot check live availability in a normal chat, so it suggests names without any idea whether the .com is free. In our test, 219 of 220 were already registered.
Do AI tools like ChatGPT check domain availability?
No. A chat assistant generates text, it does not query the domain registry, so a name it calls available is just a guess. Always verify the .com against the live registry before trusting it.
What percentage of startup names have an available .com?
In our sample of 220 AI-generated names, only 0.5% (1 in 220) had a free .com. Among names generated in availability-optimized styles and then filtered, the rate rises to roughly 7.4%, still low, which is why checking every name matters.
How do you check if a startup name has an available .com?
Query the live .com registry via RDAP, the ICANN-mandated protocol, rather than trusting a generator. DomainGenius verifies every name this way, so it only shows names that are genuinely registrable.
What kind of startup name is most likely to have a free .com?
Invented coinages, fused compounds, and near-words (a real word with one brandable mutation). They are unique strings nobody else registered. Single dictionary words are almost always gone.
Can I trust a name ChatGPT says is available?
No. ChatGPT cannot see the registry, so treat any availability claim as unverified. Check the exact .com against the live registry before you build anything around the name.
By the DomainGenius team. We generated and registry-checked all 220 names in this study ourselves via RDAP; the data is first-hand and reproducible.
See available .com domains for your idea
Describe your idea, get brandable .com names verified available in real time.
Try DomainGenius free